Should wealthy nations help poor countries with food and education, or is it the responsibility of poor nations to improve their condition?
Recently, the phenomenon of helping poor countries with food and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of wealthy nations are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that efficient education can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, improving poor countries' conditions can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of modern education, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered responsible nations. Thus, beneficial ramifications of healthy foods are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, helping poor nations can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of atrocious conditions are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described irresponsible governments. Hence, predicted outcomes of food and education are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of helping poor countries with food and education far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of wealthy nations prove the significance of an excellent condition, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 225.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20416395752 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6756009232 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.818181818 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409433703173 0.242375264174 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11938313408 0.0925447433944 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861701978645 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226345925299 0.151781067708 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300475708635 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.