In some countries, the number of shootings increases because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Recent days, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trends to see prodigies discussing whether allowing people to own guns is good for society or not. Every individual holds distinct view on it. This essay will prudently persuade why liberal gun laws are dangerous for individual and the society.
To commence with, people, nowadays are impulsive and short-tempered, therefore, if they would be given arms or guns they might not hesitate to use them. More specifically, even in the absence of these weapons, people may fight but there are very less chances that they would kill anyone for only a sudden anger or small fight. However, if they would be carrying guns, the chances of these small fights transforming into life threatening fights are very high. In India, for example, in the remote rural areas there is a trend to shoot in weddings, which many times, have caused the sudden death of people attending the marriage function. Thus, seen in this light, carrying weapons can possibly elevate aggressive shootings.
Another pivotal insight that should not neglected, meanwhile, is the use of guns for illegal doings. To put it more precisely, few criminal minded dwellers me misuse these arms for illegal activities such as to threaten someone to loot his money. Therefore, consistent with this line of thinking, owning arms can lead to more crime in the city.
In conclusion, I strongly feel and believe that liberal gun laws can increase the crimes in the country, hence, must be banned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ns, people may fight but there are very less chances that they would kill anyone for...
^^^^
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...s, seen in this light, carrying weapons can possibly elevate aggressive shootings. Anothe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.036 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.550999804 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8493908655 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.916666667 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.072314329744 0.242375264174 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0257360657423 0.0925447433944 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292612664038 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0434011808816 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170490367901 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.