Some like to do the same routine daily, but some prefer to change”. Discuss your view?
Recent days, there has been colossal upsurge in the trends to see prodigies discussing the people's preferences on their work types. While many progressively adore the ideology to do the same routine every day, others despise it. This essay will elaborate on both sides of the argument to prudently persuade why change in daily routine is essential.
On the one hand, there are myriad of advantages to keep changing our area of work. To commence with, since in this way, people get chance to work on many sectors, thus, it elevates their knowledge and broadens their horizon. In addition, these people are found to be happier and more content. Recent empirical research from "World's Happy People" magazine, established that people who frequently change their job, are more social and happier than the people doing same kind of work in their whole life. Seen in this light, it is undeniable that changing job types is vital for a happy life.
Despite the advantages mentioned above, the advantages of performing same work regularly, meanwhile, cannot be neglected. Firstly, owning to doing same kind of task for many years, these people become expert in their field. Moreover, they do not have to learn new things every now and then, as in case of frequent job changers. However, the prominent disadvantage of this trend cannot be marginalised that is, because these people have not done any other work in their entire life, they are not flexible, and if in any case they lose their job, they are not able to earn their living.
In conclusion, owing to the above-mentioned arguments, I radically feel and believe that frequent change in work type is essential for holistic growth of every individual. Consequently, I would suggest that every person should challenge himself by stepping out of his comfort zone and try something different than his regular work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...r, they do not have to learn new things every now and then, as in case of frequent job changers. H...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...omfort zone and try something different than his regular work.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 20.9802955665 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 310.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06451612903 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63957711115 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587096774194 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5757813755 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.142857143 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120943596974 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464985270326 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397682123711 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804595819294 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540907923947 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.