Some organisations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this.
Recently, the phenomenon of decision making process and its correspondng impacts have a sparked heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such as issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that employees of organizations can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, goods and services can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that quality of services, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university students, I perfrormed an academic experiments which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramification of both quality assurance and customer services apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, organization integrating might increase the consequences of employee motivation. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with organization performance. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of communities standards.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of organization agility far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of improving mangement skills prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rny issues potential implication.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89787234043 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37944683825 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693617021277 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3620163601 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152088335255 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454264162666 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466605829862 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738687776756 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356849116678 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.26 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.