Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Few individuals suggest that educational subjects like chemistry, physics and history should be learned from academies, however, others feel that pupils will acquire more advantage in studying practical applications such as machineries and culinary. In my opinion, it is the fundamental foundation of knowledge for the former and to secure immediate employment for the latter. This essay will discuss my justification for the stated reasons.
To begin with, the primary objective of educational institutions is to imbibed essential knowledge to their students. Since childhood, schools are already preparing the youth to attain background information regarding various topics on sciences and cultures. To illustrate, the identification of periodic elements are taught in learning centers to be aware of the chemicals existing in the universe. Hence, school subjects are vital for any person’s accumulated wisdom throughout the years of stay in academic institutions.
On the other hand, practical programs offered cannot be ignored to students. This can also be an option for people who wanted to easily obtain a job at an acceptable wage as some persons cannot afford to pay expensive tuition fees just to earn a degree. For example, many companies are looking for vocational skills like baking and computer technician to do specific tasks. Indeed, earning money for sustaining family’s needs must be the ultimate reason on choosing this educational path.
To recapitulate, certain learners should ensure that their career journey should not be compromised whatever their decisions are. It will all boil down to making the most of what is available to become triumphant in life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, look, regarding, so, for example, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6007751938 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02452020867 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682170542636 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4472960952 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.153846154 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174646440786 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526147099465 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682863842303 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966421015137 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624509623532 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.