Recently, the phenomenon of higher educations and its impact to increase the future job opportunities and the employment rate has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question ''Is the only purpose of higher education to prepare individuals for future job opportunities?'' Whereas it is a widely held view that the sole goal of higher education is to make academic graduates ready for future professions, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, appropriate employment is bound up inextricably with higher education, which indicates they lead to both better jobs and higher profession wages. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2015 demonstrates the relationship between future job opportunities and high-level education as well as an exponential increase in the number of professionals. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of professional job positions is correlated positively with not only higher university education but also skilled specialists.
Within the realm of occupation, without the slightest doubt, skilled specialists attribute to higher university education, in that it would come down to high-paid jobs, advanced occupational positions, and raise in future employment. A salient example of such attribution is university graduate, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take professional careers for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint occupation-oriented problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of higher education in increasing future professional opportunities.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes ''all's well that ends well,'' after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that the sole goal of higher education is to make academic graduates ready for future professions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78787878788 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39688758168 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599326599327 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 379.143842365 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.5365295849 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.9 104.977214359 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7 20.9669160288 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202499245636 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824064249118 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06755940702 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138144960449 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629023683752 0.0609392437508 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 12.6369458128 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.66 53.1260098522 31% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.9458128079 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.0 9.94827586207 221% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 10.5123152709 209% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.