It has been suggested that students should be evolved in unpaid community services as a compulsory part of high school programmes. I fully agree that volunteering activities should be required as a mandatory part of high school plans since those activities provide them with lots of benefits in terms of well-rounded development.
By doing volunteer works, students can freely learn how to communicate with others cleverly, improve their personal skills, manage times effectively and so forth. In most schools, and university in particular, unpaid community works such as clubs are quite popular. There is a specialization in one area in these after-school activities, which could help students master in that field. Moreover, it is a valuable work experience and an excellent preparation for students’s future career.
A impartive unpaid community service in high school curriculum not only a ‘pedestal’ for pupils but also a chance to become more opened-heart with tough lives. Nowadays, unfortunately, most students take part in school commonly have comfortable life that they are unaware how lucky they are. In this case, joining a charity job can help students learn to extend their hands to poor people. Furthermore, pupils might be able to determind tolerant attitudes with people a round through this volunteer works.
In conclusion, i extremely agree with this idea, with above explained, it will help them elevate employability. I hope all countries will be spreaded this rule in the near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...n for students's future career. A impartive unpaid community service in h...
^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...vice in high school curriculum not only a 'pedestal' for pupils but als...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45991561181 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17512721301 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658227848101 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2307326179 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.833333333 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226306828493 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808297944256 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856200283451 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130047951912 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816131156445 0.0609392437508 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.