Some people point that experiential( i.e learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of some people point that experiential learning can work well in formal education and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter complicated procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning by formal education can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the formal education and experiential learning are both can point for some people can provide the society with some noticeable effects which is rooted in this fact that the crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of a complex phenomenon and accordingly this common phenomenon apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, experiential learning can work well in formal education might increase the consequences of critical issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning by doing something can work well in formal education for some people than experiential learning far outweigh of its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...d in this fact that the crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65467625899 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20470288704 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589928057554 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.401476645 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.909090909 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369225777823 0.242375264174 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135976528918 0.0925447433944 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143789520122 0.071462118173 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236194491177 0.151781067708 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449901116151 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.