Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary school to universities, too much time spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Agree or disagree?
Most of the people say that, the various stages from primary schools to universities are spending too much time on studying facts rather than enough on learning practical skills. I agree with this point because in most of the education system around the world are giving more importance to books than practical skills.
Firstly, some experts think that practical experiences is more important than learning the books. We have to consume most of time on learning the practical skills. The students could easily understand and grasp the facts properly. They will get more creative and imagination talents through this practical assignments. They could study the technical aspects once it is physically experienced. The natural behavior of the human beings are getting more exposure to learn from physical skills. For example, in stone age period, the human did more experiments and invented many things from practical skills not from learning facts. Of course, they didn't get the learning material as well. So practical skills are more important than learning facts. So the education system have plan to change their system to spend more time on learning practical skills than learning facts in all levels of education.
Secondly, some sort of people believe that studying the books will gain more knowledge than practical skills. They are arguing that to understand the practical facts, the students should have strong subject knowledge. The students could study the technical terms and subject knowledge. The students could study the technical terms and subject knowledge to do the experiment skills. So they are believing that, learning facts are more important than learning practical skills. So most of time should be spent on learning facts.
In conclusion, even though to understand the technical terms and subjects, we don't need to spend more time on learning the facts. Sparing too much time on learning practical skills is good for all level of education and it leads the world in better place to live and gain more knowledge on research study as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtance to books than practical skills. Firstly, some experts think that practic...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 649, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ot from learning facts. Of course, they didnt get the learning material as well. So p...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 779, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'planned'.
Suggestion: planned
...ing facts. So the education system have plan to change their system to spend more ti...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ning facts in all levels of education. Secondly, some sort of people believe th...
^^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ge to do the experiment skills. So they are believing that, learning facts are more important...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nd the technical terms and subjects, we dont need to spend more time on learning the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, of course, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 333.0 242.827586207 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1981981982 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50116440702 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.423423423423 0.580463131201 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6551724138 158% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7103345374 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.55 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.65 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 2.91625615764 309% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389006016793 0.242375264174 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131225223021 0.0925447433944 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106282631495 0.071462118173 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261519192119 0.151781067708 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657603326565 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.1260098522 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.32886699507 81% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.