Some people say that written communication is better than oral communication.are you agree or disagree?
Over the past few decades, there has been ambivalence over whether written communication is more useful or oral communication, in other words there is a wide range of discussion among people with regard to mode of communication. Some argue in favor of written communication where as some other people believe that oral communication is more effective. I sanguinely believe that written communication can be more effective and of course I do not like underrate the importance of oral communication.
Conspicuously, there are a myriad of reasons behind why written communication is more effective. One of the most compelling reasons is that written communication allows us to think for some time and come up with appropriate details that we want to convey. When we get more time, we can organize our ideas in proper shape. Another cogent reason is that written communication gives us an opportunity to go through the draft multiple times. If we are not convinced with the draft, we can always change it and then rewrite. Consequently, we can try to be more in this method of communication.
Despite these beliefs, there are other skeptics who conjecture that oral communication is more useful. Approaches to deal with these concerns are numerous. Firstly, in oral communication, we meet the person and convey our ideas. In this way whether our presentation is not clear to other person, we can change the style of presentation that other person can understand. Moreover, in this method of communication, we can get the feedback quickly. This saves our time. Sometimes certain pieces of information need to response quickly. In such case oral communication could be the right solution.
In a nutshell, we understand that each type of communication offers a range of benefits. It is advisable to choose the best type of communication in each given scenarios.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...argue in favor of written communication where as some other people believe that oral com...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...nication. Conspicuously, there are a myriad of reasons behind why written communica...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, of course, in other words, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 20.9802955665 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 5.75862068966 399% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 303.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15841584158 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22233583691 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508250825083 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6551724138 150% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8365154608 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2631578947 104.977214359 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9473684211 20.9669160288 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223191967301 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076711502523 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781081973822 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145032710998 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989417933432 0.0609392437508 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.