Some people suggest that each family should only have a car and encourage alternative vehicle. Do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of the opinion that each family should have only one car and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that using personal car can be highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly destroyer and negative by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that using public vehicles can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support encouraging people to travel with alternative transportation. At first, traveling by personal car is faster and more convenient for most people. However, if everyone use their cars to reach their jobs it can be the cause of many disorders in the city. For example, many people waste their times in the crowded streets and highways due to they do not interested to travel by train or bus.
In addition, many people avoided standing in a straight line for bus or Metro that is inconvenient for them that using the personal car. But, crowded avenues and highways is the main reason of environmental problems such as air pollution. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2017 has shown that the main cause of the climate change in around the world is the gas emission by cars.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this viewpoint, I profoundly believe that the despite all difficulties with traveling with public transportation, the benefits of alternative vehicles are far outweighed its drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of the opinion ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... interested to travel by train or bus. In addition, many people avoided standin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the world is the gas emission by cars. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12992125984 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96444144416 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61811023622 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.612996553 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.454545455 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.25397266985 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149444965787 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550865247121 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654386795119 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774950068127 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478815718414 0.0609392437508 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 77.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.