some people think the advertising is bad because it encouraged people to buy things they do not need or cannot afford, while others believe that advertisement is good because it can improve people’s lives.
It has a long been a subject of discussion whether some people think the advertising is bad because it encouraged people to buy things they do not need or cannot afford, while others believe that advertisement is good because it can improve people’s lives or not. In my opinion, the former notion has several elements that deserve attention and I will explain why using pertinent arguments.
There are myriad of arguments in favor of my context, one most conspicuous one line in the fact that people should be extra careful with their decisions. For example, according to a recent survey done by the Stanford University, 45% people benefit from the above mentioned notion, whereas 30% people face disadvantages due to it. Hence, it is apparent why many citizens are in favor of the above stance.
Another argument in support of my view is that governments worldwide have become more active in dealing with this situation. To illustrate, as per recent academic research carried out by the Australian government, 60% citizens gained immensely from the proposed government reforms. They improved their existing scenario tremendously and paved that the way for a better economic future. Therefore, not only will this make people more careful and pragmatic in their approach, but also it will lead to a better living standard.
From what has been discussed above, it is clear that the benefits of the given topic significantly outweigh the drawbacks. Lastly, in my opinion, it would be wise to say some people think the advertising is bad because it encouraged people to buy things they do not need or cannot afford, while others believe that advertisement is good because it can improve people’s lives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08540925267 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75661771914 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576512455516 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.3194841731 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.909090909 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.563566750154 0.242375264174 233% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180423023508 0.0925447433944 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.310697877841 0.071462118173 435% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.38075004775 0.151781067708 251% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.293044516919 0.0609392437508 481% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.