Recently the phenomenon of charging foreign visitors more than local people and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that visiting the cultural and historical attractions cannot be highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that paying attention to foreign tourists can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support attracting more foreign tourist than local visitors. At first, informing local people about the attractions of country lessons local people about their own ancient culture. However, paying attention to foreign tourists has many benefits for the country. For example, foreigners could improve the tourism industry which enhances the financial situation of governments.
In addition, one disadvantage of hosting foreign travelers is the possibility of importing strange cultures to our society. But, with better management societies could import their old culture and traditions to other people and make their economy by attracting foreign exchange such as Dollar.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the benefits of charging foreigners to visit a host country far outweighed its drawbacks. Not only for cultural reasons, but also for economic profits too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently the phenomenon of charging fore...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he financial situation of governments. In addition, one disadvantage of hosting...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cting foreign exchange such as Dollar. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90685089309 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648401826484 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3921194811 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.818181818 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298914240084 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103494873405 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667466748534 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166361801367 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704731965079 0.0609392437508 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.