Some people think human behaviors can be limited by laws, others think laws have little effect. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of law effectiveness in limiting people activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of action individual freedom is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that imposing discipline can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a human standpoint, the law is not adequate to directing person behaviours can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of respect to the free spirit of humanity, as well as the power of choosing based on moral standards, are inextricably bound up. According to some surveys undertaken by UCLA university, more than 60% of people assert that they do not steal because of their moral upbringing, nor because of strict rules.
Nevertheless, within the realm of sociological science, restriction of human actions by law might increase the consequences of settling regularity and security. Opponents believe that not all people have the same level of awareness. Consequently, the fundamental aspects of the need to be guided could relate to this reality that the demerits of criminal activities pertain to defective laws. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both civilized and controlled society apparently can be seen. As a tangible example, the number of drivers wearing seat belts has increased after establishing high penalties for not using them.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of changing the people behaviour habits by law far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of determining the red lines prove the significance of the necessity of clear and comprehensive rules, but also pinpoint the safe society implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41471571906 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1094830978 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642140468227 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9222178845 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.916666667 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206639981688 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643394115566 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522308807547 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109624960558 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300280051061 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.