Recently, the phenomenon of studying past history and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that thinking about the past cannot help us, such an issue is regarded as thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that understanding past events can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support exploring the events occurred in the past. At first, in a view, people think history has nothing for us and is wasting the present time. However, history teaches us many lessons about our ancestors and their experiences. For example, we can learn about medical failures in the last centuries and how our ancestors learned to treat hard diseases in the past.
In addition, studying the past interferes with modern life and technologies that need new ways of thinking about the world. But, recent technologies resulted from the researches about the earliest technologies. For instance, a recent scientific research undertaken by a reputable university has shown that a significant number of new inventions are the production of studies about past information.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both views, I profoundly believe that the benefits of studying the past history far outweighed its drawbacks. But not only for the experts for all people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of studying pas...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to treat hard diseases in the past. In addition, studying the past interfere...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion of studies about past information. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27391304348 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95537381807 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617391304348 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9744465915 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.083333333 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301053434173 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105320097853 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825240230518 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170827201609 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756673204646 0.0609392437508 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 82.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 74.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.