Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recent days, advertisements and hoardings are overhanging in all the public schools which make the students as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. This phenomenon plays a vital role in children studies and offers many nasty consequences for them. I strongly agree the above notion and elucidate with suitable examples.
To commence with, advertisements related with extracurricular activities that stimulate the scholar's parents and students to get enroll in the games. As a result of this, people spend a lot of money towards to their offspring additional talents, but this impact their financial circumstances. For instance, a study conducted by High School from United States reveals that, more number of students are not concentrate on their studies because of co-curricular activities as those plays need time and strength which is not efficiently given by students.
Furthermore, adding reasons with above notion, students are distracted from the boarding and this induce the conflict among the students pertaining to their level of arguments. Moreover, schools offer education and additional play and games for their student to get significant growth in their studies as well as in their life. Therefore, advertisement boarding are part of corporate sponsors who only do make money motive not in the service.
To recapitulate, every student has uniqueness talent in terms of study and other games, so parents and teachers must take their talent in the account and provide effective coaching. Public schools management and parents should put their foot forward together to curb the issues.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53629032258 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93300143173 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616935483871 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7019948002 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.818181818 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176854746733 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726703707075 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809481416631 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120390254686 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764737635414 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.