some people think the universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of experimental learning and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of educational achievement is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that academic qualification can be plus and I am going to discuss that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, formal education can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that improving learner's performance as well as educational perspective, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that practical learning improves intellectual knowledge as well. Thus, the beneficial consequences of practical and laboratory experiments apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of educational issues, theoretical learning environment might have some negative consequences. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of learning process related to this reality that the demerits of theoretical knowledge pertain to learning disorders. As a tangible example, a scientific research has been undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of theoretical training courses are correlated negatively with skill cultivation. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived the notion of educational strategies as a key factor in the learning process.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of informal learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of vocational education proved the significance of intellectual development, but also pinpoint conventional education implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'scientific research'.
Suggestion: scientific research
...rning disorders. As a tangible example, a scientific research has been undertaken by a prestigious un...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03396226415 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45043942388 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641509433962 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4172680368 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.25 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122707200725 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406778453709 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345774718989 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633310166578 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040017163592 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.69 11.5310837438 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.22 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.