Some people think that younger employees often have more skills, knowledge and motivation than the old employees. To what extent do you agree with it? Use your experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of recruitment of younger employee in companies and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of motivation in a younger worker is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the older employees' experience can be a plus, and I will analyze both views throughout this essay.
From a professional standpoint, young employees can provide the company with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of updated skills, as well as enthusiastic to work, are inextricably bound up. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by Harvard school business has asserted that the downside of defeated companies is correlated negatively with the number of young staff in technological fields. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both up-to-date knowledge and youth risk-taking apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, many employers and I believe that hiring older employees might increase the consequences of mastery in complex situations. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of successful companies could relate to this reality that the merits of mentoring newcomers pertain to the spirit of responsibility among older workers. According to my own experience as an employer of a little company, I have found that experienced employers are less needed to supervise and more focus on solving problems than younger.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that balancing the number of young and old staff is the best way. Not only do the advantages of booming businesses prove the significance of dynamic and young members but also pinpoint the significant role of advanced and older employees to tackle the problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46917808219 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11658700534 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61301369863 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.4913764189 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.181818182 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191572887676 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632605912369 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374518541928 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102361918086 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259895276729 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.