Some say that in today's world the value of humanities has been eclipsed by the necessity of preparing for specific wealth-producing careers, such as medicine. Discuss whether you think there is a role in today's changing world for the study of

Essay topics:

Some say that in today's world the value of humanities has been eclipsed by the necessity of preparing for specific wealth-producing careers, such as medicine. Discuss whether you think there is a role in today's changing world for the study of the humanities.

Recently, the phenomenon of the value of humanities and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficail, such issue is regarded thoroughly both construcructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that specific wealth producing careerscan be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint changing world for the study of the humanities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up.According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiement which dicovered current policies. Thus beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, studying and researching of humanities might increase the consequences of critical needs.As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of exploring the consequences of humanities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: According
...ate outcomes, are inextricably bound up.According to my own experience, when I was a univ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 368, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ement which dicovered current policies. Thus beneficial ramifications of both this c...
^^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., studying and researching of humanities might increase the consequences of criti...
^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...ease the consequences of critical needs.As a tangible example, some scientific res...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82520325203 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35757839407 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674796747967 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.6338229812 50.4703680194 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.222222222 104.977214359 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4444444444 7.25397266985 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111567727806 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361952636754 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366759147726 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0579761626502 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317848125056 0.0609392437508 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 12.6369458128 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 53.1260098522 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 10.9458128079 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.46 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.