Recently, the phenomenon of classifying some type of employment suitable for women or men, and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that separating the jobs cannot be highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that this sorting can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to agree that the jobs should be classified for males and females. At first, the jobs should be appropriate for the gender, which occupied on it. The hard works are not suitable for women due to their delicate body systems. For example. The jobs like welding and mining need to muscular power that being in men's body.
In addition, the men are not able to work in the jobs that need to sprit and delicacy. The men do hard works and the women do delicate things such as nursing and the teachers of kindergarten. For instance, a recent research conducted by MTV University researchers in 2014 has shown that a significant number of women tend to work in careers like a primary school teacher is related to their moral ability.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the benefits of separating jobs for two genders far outweighed its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of classifying ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uscular power that being in mens body. In addition, the men are not able to wor...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sing and the teachers of kindergarten. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 1207.87684729 81% => OK
No of words: 198.0 242.827586207 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95454545455 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81936273726 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60101010101 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 379.143842365 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7669964559 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212452460606 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846806437786 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624916738553 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115659097634 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396998802436 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.