Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues – such as environmental problems – that
we should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding?
Recently, the pleasure of space travel has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question, "is there any environmental problem for that?". Whereas it is a widely held view that space travel is fantastic, I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economical standpoint, environmental problems are bound up inextricably with the increase of space crafts, which indicates they lead to both global warming and greenhouse gasses. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrate the relationship between space crafts and health problems, as well as an exponential increase in global warming. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the likelihood of space travel correlated positively with not only issues but also environmental problems.
Within the realm of asteroid science, without the slightest doubt, environmental problems attribute to space travel and time used, in that it would come down to space crafts, shuttles, and The international space station. A salient example of such attribution is individual travels, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take the movement to space for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint environmental problems. Hence it is reasonable to infer the pivotal rule of space travel.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that space travel is a major source of environmental problems. However, we perceive that, with the benefit of hindsight, the more we research the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ity to pinpoint environmental problems. Hence it is reasonable to infer the pivotal r...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57971014493 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14278127525 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634057971014 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1691394114 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197084001421 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690001380445 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044775547243 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117888503441 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330883396039 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.