Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues – such as environmental problems – that we should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding?
Recently, the phenomenon of budget allocation to spacefaring despite other critical global problems and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although I and many believe that the matter of prioritizing global warming is highly beneficial and such issue is regarded as thoroughly constructive by a substantial number of individuals. But some opposers are inclined to consider that exploring our surrounding world can be a plus, so I will analyze both views throughout this essay.
In the realm of science, space travel may increase the consequences of discovering the signs of life on other planets, Because, the fundamental aspects of living in another space can be related to the reality that depredation of the earth by individuals pertain to the demerits of their destructive activities. As an example, some experiments on Mercury's land undertaken by NASA have asserted it will be considered as a new home for humans in the next 300 years.
However, ecological issues like climate change or carbon emission can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the drawbacks of Ozon depletion, as well as people's unawareness of outcome of their activities on their environment, are inextricably bound up. Hence, governments have to allocate a huge budget to increase public awareness and control their behaviour by establishing practical rules. For example, according to a report published in the Guardian Newspaper, the USA has spent 30 billion dollars to preserve vulnerable plants and animals in the last year.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that prioritizing to dedicate eco-budget between urgent actions to reduce environmental hazards and space tour is vital. As a result, not only consideration of universal issues prove the significance of global warming, but also pinpoint financial assistance implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12178723739 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656666666667 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5024630542 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5012604909 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.8 104.977214359 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.9669160288 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156058040676 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501797663074 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259806476129 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808954054263 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261123653706 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 12.6369458128 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 10.9458128079 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.98 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.23 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.3980295567 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.