Sports and games create disturbance in students’ life because students cannot fully concentrate on their studies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recent days, there has been the colossal upsurge in the trends to see prodigies discussing whether games are good for good for students or not. Few people believe that sports are essential for holistic growth of a child, others undoubtedly despise it. This essay will prudently persuade why physical activities are vital for everyone, especially children.
To commence with, sports are indispensable for the physical health of students. More specifically, playing sports increases blood circulation and refrains from getting them obese. Moreover, it is well said, "A healthy mind resides in a healthy body". According to a recent empirical research conducted by "World Health Organisation", it was found that academic performance of students who play sports is better than those who do not. Seen in this light, it is undeniable that games play a significant role in keeping students healthy.
Another insight that must not be neglected, meanwhile, is the learning of social skills. In other words, pupils learn to work in a group, team coordination, and cooperation, dealing with other people etcetera while playing. These skills not only help them to make more friends but also helps in their career. Therefore, consistent with this line of thinking, sports are necessary for social skill development in students.
In conclusion, I radically feel and believe that games are not an obstacle but a tool to elevate the intellectual skills and consequently the academic performance of students. Thus, I would suggest that all schools must introduce it as a mandatory subject in their curriculum.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'good for'.
Suggestion: good for
... prodigies discussing whether games are good for good for students or not. Few people believe tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43650793651 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00257091486 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5878379349 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8571428571 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146880730048 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440405184696 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039771133834 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765282770766 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056071507279 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.