Recently, the phenomenon of studying the literature of a hundred years ago and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that these works are just wasting the time, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that these studies can be a plus for the students.
To begin with, there are various reasons to agree with studying historical literature. At first, the disadvantage of revising the documents of the past century is their useless knowledge. However, studying historical sciences could be beneficial for students. For example, the students will find the efforts of past scientists for solving the problems.
In addition, past knowledge is out of date and cannot be used in our modern world. But, the students could learn how our ancestors mixed various sciences to find solutions for their issues. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2017 has shown that a significant number of past scientists such as Farabi and Edison used different sciences such as mathematics and physics together to build instruments like microscope that is very important today.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the benefits of studying works of historical literature far outweighed its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of studying the...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tudies can be a plus for the students. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t scientists for solving the problems. In addition, past knowledge is out of da...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...croscope that is very important today. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 222.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43243243243 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01461418917 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617117117117 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7561245527 50.4703680194 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.636363636 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.25397266985 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253262966919 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836603080289 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553148339043 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135868374042 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637321243691 0.0609392437508 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.