studying works of literatures of a hundred years ago is a waste of time for students today. Agree or disagree. Give yous reason and example.
Recently, the phenomenon of studying the literature of a hundred years ago by students, and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that this work is wasting time for students today, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that these studies can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to agree with studying the literatures far years ago. At first, it seems to has no new thing for students in the modern world. However, these works teach students about their origins and their literacy. For example, the students can learn about how their languages developed by their ancestors.
I addition, many people think studying the past literatures can take students away from the modern view of the world. But, the students can learn about the traditions of their country, which help nations to utilize it in modern industries. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2017 has shown that a significant number of advanced countries used their traditions in the tourism industry to benefit their economy.
I conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly, believe that despite the opposition of this work with activities in the age of technology, the benefits of studying the past literatures far outweighed its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of studying the...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 122, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'have'.
Suggestion: have
...es far years ago. At first, it seems to has no new thing for students in the modern...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anguages developed by their ancestors. I addition, many people think studying t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ism industry to benefit their economy. I conclusion, while there are several co...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25941422594 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91215793767 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589958158996 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0773209318 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.272727273 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303063994545 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108349825031 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724522825055 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169598638443 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091018947166 0.0609392437508 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.