Recently, the phenomenon of successful companies and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of reputation is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that selling policy would be a plus for a successful organization and I am going to discuss that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, reputation of an accomplished company can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that reputation achievement as well as customer satisfaction. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that well-known companies emphasize on marketing strategies to achieve a sustainable popularity by their customers. Thus, the beneficial consequences of reputation and selling policy apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of management issues, considerable reputation might have some negative consequences. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of overall population related to this reality that the demerits of being popular pertain to the struggling with the competitive environment. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of reputation are correlated negatively with competitors. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the reputation as a risk-taking action of organizations.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of selling strategies for successful organizations such as discount far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the advantages of priceless offers prove the significance of selling policies, but also pinpoint reputation implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91605839416 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46621001383 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627737226277 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7404361588 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.083333333 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14608333321 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04954054396 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297486348129 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849107289803 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311446749259 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.