Teenagers should receive lessons on principles of personal finance, such as investing and debt. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of "teenagers should receive lessons on principles of personal finance, such as investing and debt" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that investment principles might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that principles of personal finance can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, lessons on principles of personal finance for teenagers can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that learning personal finance and managing debts are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of teenagers' investment on their families' welfare. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both finance lessons and teenagers' financial abilities can be observed.
Within the realm of economics science, without the slightest doubt, not learning the personal finance by teenagers might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the lack of financial knowledge. Moreover, fundamental aspects of financial subjects can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of lessons on investment can pertain to the education system. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of receiving investment lessons were correlated positively with new investment methods, the local authorities would ultimately address teenagers' interest in personal finance. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the debt concept.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support the idea that the merits of receiving lessons on principles of personal finance, such as investing and debt by teenagers far outweigh its downsides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84666666667 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18997735972 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 379.143842365 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8623972988 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.454545455 104.977214359 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39183416345 0.242375264174 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141155557441 0.0925447433944 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763064349622 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245636963826 0.151781067708 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333301796457 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 12.6369458128 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.