Television serves many functions. Watching TV makes us relax. We can learn knowledge and information from TV programs. Besides, TV can also be seen as a companion. To what extent do you agree with this?
Several life changing things were invented in the last century. TV was one of them and according to some people, TV can help us in relaxing and at the same time we can gain knowledge and information from it. This essay will discuss how this notion is incorrect.
To begin with, we can learn from several other inventions now. With the advancement in IT field, especially invention of computers and internet every kind of information has become easily accessible. For example, by searching on search engines such as google, we can get information about anything in seconds. Therefore, TV is not the best source of knowledge in this time.
Secondly, the best companionship can be found only once we interact with the humans. As it is said the human is a social animal which means that he needs to be engaged in social activities in order to enjoy and satisfy himself. For example, according to a survey by American Institue of Psychology, the most satisfied people were the ones who were more socially active rather than people who were involved in indoor activities such as watching TV or playing video games. Clearly, this indicates that TV is not helpful enough for mental peace.
In conclusion, there are many other sources to get information and keeping calm instead of watching TV. In my opinion, we need to replace the use of TV in our lives to live a healthy life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun life seems to be countable; consider using: 'Several lives'.
Suggestion: Several lives
Several life changing things were invented in the la...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77405857741 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63209516 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627615062762 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1339035387 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7692307692 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342082842706 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116059955808 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878323383474 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210179445925 0.151781067708 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560501256618 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 12.6369458128 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.5310837438 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.