There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What
are the benefits and detrimental effects of it?
Recently, the phenomenon of modern inventions has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "which invention is more important in our daily life?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that among the recent inventions such as antibiotics and airplanes the computers are more influential. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the communicative standpoint, ease of communication is bound up inextricably with computers development, which indicates they lead to both the internet and social interactions. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists demonstrates the relationship between websites and emails as well as an exponential increase in international relations. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of invasion of privacy is correlated positively with not only connection speed improvement but also modern communication services.
Within the realm of technology, without the slightest doubt, updated computers attribute to hi-tech progress, in that it would come down to software, hardware, and smartphones. A salient example of such attribution is financial calculations, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take single-core processors for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint technophobes problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to the computer industry, cyber education and even medical robots. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of industrialized computer devices.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all'swell that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above I firmly believe that computers are the most important invention in our routine life. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...aying goes 'allswell that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88395904437 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36554422164 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 139.433497537 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675767918089 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2929581818 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.142857143 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161726126455 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433884820662 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734144527125 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103735897117 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960163550497 0.0609392437508 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.