There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. Do you agree that the problem outweigh the benefits of mobile phones?
One of the most conspicuous topics of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that social, medical problem associated with the use of mobile phones. There is a widespread worry that that this will only lead to a myriad of concern in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay
There are a number if arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one topic is that there are social, medical and technical problems associated with use of mobile phones can not only contribute doing much use of mobile phone is not good for social and medical, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can be one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence in concerned
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only why follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it apparent why many are favor of my there are social, medical and technical problem associated with the use of mobile phones.
In the view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that benefits of there are social, medical and technical problem associated with the use of mobile phone are indeed too great too ignore
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...ile phones. There is a widespread worry that that this will only lead to a myriad of conc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his and I will explain why in this essay There are a number if arguments in favor...
^^^
Line 2, column 697, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f prosperity and excellence in concerned Another pivotal aspect of the aforementi...
^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'problems'?
Suggestion: problems
...there are social, medical and technical problem associated with the use of mobile phone...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'problems'?
Suggestion: problems
...there are social, medical and technical problem associated with the use of mobile phone...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 189, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to ignore'?
Suggestion: to ignore
...se of mobile phone are indeed too great too ignore
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91608391608 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72001005369 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506993006993 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.5024630542 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8196429521 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.222222222 104.977214359 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7777777778 20.9669160288 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405816842628 0.242375264174 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192630288178 0.0925447433944 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.204301112162 0.071462118173 286% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274838107909 0.151781067708 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685600383663 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.3980295567 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 71.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.