There is no need for newspapers in modern world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, online news channels and information available on the Internet is decreasing the use and value of newspapers, which attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention from the public. It can be agreed that newspapers are playing a vital role in everyone`s life and still a great source of information, while other hand stands a perspective that newspapers are not required in this technological world. This essay will elaborate both sides and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of reasons why the newspaper is a good medium of information, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that people who live out of cities do not have access to internet and television, to the newspaper can provide up to date information about current happenings around the world. Not only can rural area population get benefit from newspapers, but it can also benefit old generation who cannot use new technical devices. Thus, the newspaper is an old and convenient method of information.
Nevertheless, some people hols an opposing view and tend to believe that in this modern world, there is the number of options to choose from to read the news. With newly invented devices like as, television, the radio, and online streaming people can get easy access to current events that can reduce the use of paper and can make our environment more healthier. For example, big use of paper is the main reason for deforestation and pollution. Therefore, to balance our ecological system government should stop the use of the newspaper.
In the view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some concerns, the role of the newspaper in providing information to rural area people is instrumental indeed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
...e of paper and can make our environment more healthier. For example, big use of paper is the m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11034482759 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92115983676 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575862068966 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.5996541494 50.4703680194 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.727272727 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120572549083 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451006925237 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472874025677 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682227164287 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210129344884 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.