Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes, is one of the most widely-used drugs in the sorld. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long term health costs are high – for smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of health care costs and lost productivity.
Do governments have a legitimate role to legislate to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to the individual?
Tobacco is a major drug product in the form of cigarettes. People are continuing to consume it despite the warning that smoking is injurious to health. This is a teething problem particularly for youngsters and homeless people. The government has a profound role to tackle this problem and I believe there are a number of ways to solve this problem.
Firstly, the government needs to be more active in providing quality education for school goers to educate about the risk of cigarette smoking and its effect on one's health. Secondly, the government can implement a hefty tax on its purchase and manufacturing companies to limit the manufacturing and selling to the public. Thirdly, the government can ask both public and private organizations to advertise against the use of tobacco related products and encourage people to quit it by setting up an accessible way to refrain from its use.
Nevertheless, the parents and guardians can also play role models to monitor their children's activity, guide and support them as necessary by educating them about the risk of smoking. Most often, youngsters are directly or indirectly instils the behaviour from their immediate friends and families, hence, youngsters need to be closely supervised by their parents.
To put into an end, smoking is very harmful to health which can reduce the life expectancy of one's life, Therefore, the government has to intervene effectively and appropriately to control its manufacturing, distribution and its uses specially targetting young people who are vulnerable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...which can reduce the life expectancy of ones life, Therefore, the government has to ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27530364372 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00163592455 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611336032389 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1117236199 50.4703680194 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.3 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.25397266985 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127460673654 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583452523503 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623278451083 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722450832716 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423140850442 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.