Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes, is one of the most widely-used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long-term health costs are high for smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of health care costs and lost productivity. Do government have a legitimate role to legislate to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to the individual?
Many people are using tobacco in many forms, especially cigarettes. Cigarettes have been the most widely-used drugs in the world. The growing number of smokers have caused long-term health costs and lost productivity. This essay will argue that government should take steps to restrict people making a decision to smoke freely.
One strong argument would be that it will increase health care cost for government. A smoker, smoking freely without any conditions can harm their health and also the people who are around them. This will increase cancer and cardio related diseases and eventually contributes long-term health cost for the wider community. The government has better area to spend money on like education, health, and other public services rather than pouring citizen's money on the smoker and drug user people's health. Therefore, the government should introduce some law to discourage smokers.
Additionally, usage of drugs can contribute increased crime rate. If a decision of smoking is left to the individual one then the number of young people who smoke will increase significantly because teenage are always curious to explore new things. This will leads to trying other forms of tobacco and even serious drugs which are enough to ruin society discipline, lost productivity and encourage them to engage in a crime. This is how young people can damage society if no further step is taken to prevent on individual decision to smoke.
To sum up, this essay mentions that how freedom of taking drugs can increase long-term health care cost and damage society. Overall, the government should introduce certain restrictions in the usage of drugs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...her public services rather than pouring citizens money on the smoker and drug user peopl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...urious to explore new things. This will leads to trying other forms of tobacco and ev...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29433962264 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61385524294 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588679245283 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8989835571 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5333333333 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.25397266985 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290815915053 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967166744312 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733776974551 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178059326128 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074849263495 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.8988764045 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.