Today the elderly people represent a larger proportion of the population than before. What do you think are the impacts of this trend on our future?
One of the conspicuous trend of today's world is the colossal upserge in the population of the old people, which attracted numerous controversies and drwan the attention of the public. It can be agreed that increase in the population of old people can lead to a myriad of conserns, while on the other hand stands a perspective that it can have postive impact on future. This essay will further elaborate on both the sides and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the very outset, there are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. the most prepondrant one is that the upsurge in old population can decrease the number of job oppertunities for the upcoming generations. For example a recent research conducted in Sydney in the year of 2015 has found that after the increase in old population, there has been a decrease of 80% in the job availability for younger people. Therefore, it is apparent that why many are against the growing numbers of old people.
On the other hand, some people tend to believe that elder population can create positive impact on our society. Firstly, old people can teach the new generations about their work experiences and skills that they used in their workplaces. Secondly, they can not only guid the individual, but they can also suggest them the right path. According to an artical published in The Week, with the guidence of older person the proportion of the individual success has inclined 30 percent to 80 percent today.
Eventually, in view of arguments outlined above one can conclude that despite having some good impact, the role of growing number of older people in reducing the work oppertunities for young people is too dire to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...er of arguments in favour of my stance. the most prepondrant one is that the upsurg...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84879725086 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71082839607 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549828178694 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0873892058 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.583333333 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13421478507 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483763394076 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527926178633 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806276318393 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430384031036 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.