Tourism is good for some less developed countries but also has some disadvantages. Discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of tourism for less-developed countries and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of tourist attractions are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that brilliant economies can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, tourism for less-developed economies can provide society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of highly-cultured countries, are considerable. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of excellent tourists. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of increasing incomes are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, inefficient tourism can supply the community with negative impacts which are associated with the reality that the demerits of multi-cultural countries are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described atrocious approaches. Hence, predicted outcomes of irresponsible passengers are notable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of tourism for less-developed countries far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of memorable journeys prove the significance of attracting travelers, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04524886878 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50818538764 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669683257919 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3300572213 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.454545455 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235256502773 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686164386413 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816117614293 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123277745479 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327934460278 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.81 11.5310837438 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.49 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.