Travel is important for education. To what extent to you agree or disagree.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of tourists for the education purpose. There is a widespread worry that traveling will only lead to a myriad of concerns in the learning pattrans of learners. I am of the strong opinion that this apprehension is unwarranted and so should be rejected.
There is a deluge of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that by exploring the different regions students can gain the salient knowledge about the world, which they can not get from the books. Travelling can not only provide the pupils real life experience, but also make the children super intelligent. Needless to say, all these merits stand candidates in good stead, as far as their effective learning is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of giving more emphasis to traveling in learning departments is that it help the students to connect with the nature. Besides, the individuals can develop a variety of skills that can not be developed by doing theoratical subjects like as, confidence and verbal communicative skills. To exemplify, as per a recent research revealed that students who educate themselvel by exploring the world are usually more skilled and sharp minded as compare to others.
Eventually, in view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the role of travel in educating the student with more effective ways is instrumental indeed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1199.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08050847458 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86303685524 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622881355932 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8140277607 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 7.25397266985 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0569435087333 0.242375264174 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0218574618883 0.0925447433944 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240877841381 0.071462118173 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0373329238352 0.151781067708 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162873197939 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.