Universities only requires to apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbooks.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that universities should apply the content through digital media rather than printing textbooks. There is widespread worry that it would leads to myriad of concerns. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted ans so should be rejected.
There are dulge of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that in this digital era, this is a perfact tool for universities to provide up to date information to students. Not only can universities save their time, but they can also save their money by uploading content on social sites instead of printing books. Needless to say, all these marits stand universities in good stead, when it comes to providing instant information to pupils.
Another pivotal aspect of this point is that this contemporary era, students are teach savvy, everyone have their own personal laptop and smartphone, so it is easy for them to broaden their horizons of knowledge by the method. Besides, thanks to digital world, everything is downloadable as PDF format. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor digital media in universities.
To conclude, having pondered over above stated, it is crystal clear that the benefits of using digital media in student are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...There is widespread worry that it would leads to myriad of concerns. In my opinion, t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taught'.
Suggestion: taught
...hat this contemporary era, students are teach savvy, everyone have their own personal...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, so, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06278026906 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79010267325 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627802690583 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3563960036 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.636363636 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213796049444 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673910753827 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831326713692 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115891339479 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573074349053 0.0609392437508 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.