University students can learn academics through various sources like online, teacher, library etc.
What do you think which of them are reliable?
Nowadays, a phenomenon of learning through various materials has gained popularity among the students. It has created a widespread worry which can lead to a debate across the world. Many people believe that it enhances student knowledge, whereas opponents think otherwise.In my opinion, learning from other sources such as online, library and blogs is beneficial for students as it provides a plethora of information. This essay will demonstrate various facts, arguments and leads to a conclusion.
To commence with, college student relies on various sources for education and learning. Nowadays, a myriad of resources such as Bookslibrary, online learning and teachers provides education in different formats and covers various topics in detail. Not only it provides a different perspective but also available in different languages. For instance, novels of William Shakespeare has translated into many other languages which help non-native students to learn about poetry and literature.
In addition to that, online resources such as Youtube channels, Blogs and online education website allow pupils to learn on spare time and on the go. Furthermore, many tutors are also available online and record their lectures for further use. On the other hand, many believe that blogs and other online media are not well researched and hence cannot be fully reliable.
In conclusion, one can conclude that academic learning through other channels benefits students. But students must decide and carefully select the options.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...edge, whereas opponents think otherwise.In my opinion, learning from other sources...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, well, whereas, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63203463203 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79383488953 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0177480554 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.076923077 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7692307692 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.25397266985 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217917304558 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728937126645 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571418843421 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13580017963 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780790257655 0.0609392437508 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.