The university will deduct the student's score for late assignments, opinions and solutions. Or Should University penalize students for late submission of their work?
Recently, the phenomenon of deduction of score fore late assignments at university and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Alghough contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such isse is regarded thoroughly both constructive and conseqently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that getting concession to student for doing assignments can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, having good behavior with students can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovred current ppolicies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, hard penalize in university and whole institute training might increase the cosequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigioud university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceieved notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of having lanien behavior in educational institution far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78988326848 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26581325137 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684824902724 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.156804211 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.272727273 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162024178223 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522579856826 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584916408718 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847277512065 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644670741198 0.0609392437508 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.