the violent portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. people who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminal. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of rising crime because of violent movies and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of aggressive movies is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that violent movies have its effect on influence but is not the cause of the rising level of crime and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, violent films can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that aggressiveness as well as choosing inappropriate role models. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that children find their role models on action and violent movies. Thus, the beneficial consequences of influence on children and aggressive behavior apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of criminal issues, crime might increase the consequences of some other important factors such as family breakdown. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of crime related to this reality that the demerits of deficiencies pertain to poor upbringing. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of crime commitment is correlated negatively with nurturing and illiteracy. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of violent films has a minor impact on committing a crime.
In summary, While there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the violent movies' influences on children's behavior are obvious. Not only do the disadvantages of choosing wrong role models prove the significance of films, but also pinpoint criminal behavior implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... poor upbringing. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a pre...
^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to wrong'
Suggestion: to wrong
...t only do the disadvantages of choosing wrong role models prove the significance of f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in summary, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56537102473 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14131294528 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600706713781 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6307534278 50.4703680194 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.25 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 2.75862068966 362% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19041350644 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658764504924 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462064748024 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10692462114 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402712838682 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.