What do you think of bidding to host sports events? Is it a blessing or a curse? Give your opinions.
What do you think of bidding to host sports events? Is it a blessing or a curse? Give your opinions.
Recently, the phenomenon of bidding to host sports events and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complicated procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive. I am inclined to believe that it is a blessing to bid to host sports events can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, sports events are a blessing for bidding can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in this fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and accordingly complex procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, hosting for sports events is a curse might increase the consequences of critical issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of the creative process is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is true to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of it is a curse of bidding to host sports events far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35272727273 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1268498657 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610909090909 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8939292114 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.142857143 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412267304566 0.242375264174 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160291448255 0.0925447433944 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182551846864 0.071462118173 255% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31105849886 0.151781067708 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.347769964806 0.0609392437508 571% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.