What do you think is it government's duty to support financially to its natives and to provide nourishment after they console from the jobs. what is your opinion?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in government's duty to support finacially to its natives. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one's life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that government's duty provide nourishment after they console from the jobs can not only contribute to government duty poor people support in some money and some work but also lead to numerous other benefits in various feilds. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides,only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of government's duty to support financially to its natives and to provide nourishment.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of government's duty some people help in provided the basic things like jobs, food, and nourishment are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ll only lead to a myriad of concerns in ones life. However, I do not entirely accept...
^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ance. The most preponderant one is that governments duty provide nourishment after they con...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , only
...hrive and excel in varied areas. Besides,only when one follows such a system, can the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9557195572 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87203894924 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560885608856 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9097116812 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.090909091 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2060882333 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744825216411 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931295689916 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121546413591 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216875445143 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.