What is the role of writing theater plays and discussing ancient writings in the study of high school students?
Recently, the phenomenon of discussing ancient and theater writings and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of high school students are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that the role of writing theater plays can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, discussing ancient writings and writing theater can provide society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of experienced students, are remarkable. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of studying history. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of vital roles are significant.
From a scientific point of view, the role of writing theater and ancient writings can supply the community with negative influences which are associated with the reality that the demerits of inefficient high schools are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described irresponsible students. Hence, predicted outcomes of the pointless study are notable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of discussing ancient and theater writings far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of writing roles prove the significance of a high-school student, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69037656904 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17760321068 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619246861925 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.026965591 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.636363636 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.521091778501 0.242375264174 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160642939887 0.0925447433944 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10188393289 0.071462118173 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306267483945 0.151781067708 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602285561093 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.