What is your idea about lazy journalism that is commonplace in the digitalized world?
Recently, the phenomenon of lazy journalism in the digitalized world and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of a commonplace idea are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that online publications can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the digitalized world can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of efficient journalism, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of hard-working journalists. Thus, beneficial ramifications of commonplace methods are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, lazy journalism can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of the inefficient digitalized world are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described useless ideas. Hence, predicted outcomes of inexperienced journalists are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of lazy journalism in the digitalized world far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of commonplace ideas prove the significance of an online newspaper, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7850877193 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38840415275 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6835297379 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.909090909 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273477902755 0.242375264174 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852921388616 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806376266312 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158020825945 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055649390661 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.