One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the discussion on whether the structure and formation of the building can impact the lives and work in a positive or negative way. This is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of negative impacts on the individuals. I am of the strong opinion that this apprehension is unwarranted and so should be rejected.
There is a deluge of arguments that can be attributed to the positive impact of the building architecture on the employees at work. The most preponderant one is that if a workplace is well-designed that can lead to the better performance of the employees. The candidates who work in the well-established buildings can not only perform better in their daily job duties, but they can also work for extra hours without feeling any tiredness. It hardly needs mention that these merits have a great impact on the performance of the workers.
The other pivotal aspect of this argument is that along with the work performance, it can also make some positive impacts on the well-being of the employee. Besides, if the building is built by addressing all the needs like as, sunshine, and proper air circulation than it can help the employees to stay healthy and away from the chronic diseases like as, vision impairment, asthma, and obesity. To exemplify, as per the recent survey, the individuals who work in buildings with proper ventilation are far healthier than others. Therefore, good buildings play a vital role in making the employees' lifeless diseased.
To recapitulate, in view of arguments outlined above one can conclude that the role of well-formed buildings in increasing the level of performance of employees at work and keeping them healthy is instrumental indeed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9966442953 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99117548129 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530201342282 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3473352489 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.083333333 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 7.25397266985 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261158443428 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965018197847 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680358799597 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151549650326 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643308452145 0.0609392437508 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.