Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on peoples life and work?
There are myriad of factors on which our life and work depend, building architecture is undoubtedly one of them which plays a significant role. In recent times, there has been a colossal upsurge in discussions about the influence of the building architecture on the people's lives across the world, be it an affluent or impoverished nation. Various positive impacts of building designs will be discussed explicitly in this essay.
To start with, Living or working in a correctly designed architecture infuses positivity in everyone's life. People who design their homes on the basis of mythological science feel more positive and happy. Architecture science, for example, in many countries is considered as the highest priority while construction of any new dwelling. Thus, needless to say, these associated merits of building design have a positive effect.
To elucidate more, the design of the building also impacts the health of people. The notion of building architectures with proper ventilation and exposure to sunlight is prevailing since ancient times. In a recent case study, for instance, more than 40 percent of people were suffering from vitamin D deficiency because they have less or no exposure to sunlight in their homes. Hence, the structure of building plays a vital role in ameliorating the health of people.
This essay discussed the several positive impacts of building on people's lives like mental positivity, health, and safety benefits. With all the cogent merits of building designs, it seems plausible to assume that design of building does positively impact the people's life and work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... of building does positively impact the peoples life and work.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34509803922 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84318864051 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603921568627 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5378619102 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.846153846 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431140098705 0.242375264174 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156370659639 0.0925447433944 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107540509602 0.071462118173 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273125883464 0.151781067708 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840253425831 0.0609392437508 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.