Whether designing of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of the influence of buildings designs on people's life and work and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of designing of a building is highly beneficial, such argument is regarded thorough both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that positive impacts can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, the architectural design of buildings can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of increasing productivity, as well as happiness, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the impacts on people's personal life. Thus, beneficial ramifications of positive impacts and professional life apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the negative impacts of inappropriate designing might increase the consequences of behavioral characteristics. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of people's lives could relate to this reality that the demerits of lack of successful life pertain to having depression. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of modern architectures are correlated negatively with psychological issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the people's life and work far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of modern architecture prove the significance of building facts, but also pinpoint behavioral sciences implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... analyze that throughout this essay. From the social standpoint, the architec...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssional life apparently can be seen. Within the realm of science, the negativ...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...otion of this remarkable phenomenon. To conclude, while there are several com...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...oundly believe that the benefits of the peoples life and work far outweigh its drawback...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77737226277 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36503673306 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624087591241 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7534928679 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.916666667 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370365322709 0.242375264174 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112616856342 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741889513339 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197222469524 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077789322306 0.0609392437508 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.