Whether designing of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of deducting marks and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of procrastinating works is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that student's marks can be a plus, and I will discuss that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, student's works can provide society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of learning discipline, as well as working on-time, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered deductible marks. Thus, beneficial ramifications of student's assignments and working late apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the student's mark might increase the consequences of learning deficiencies. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the education system could relate to this reality that the demerits of course improvements pertain to lesson developments. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of grade's deductions are correlated negatively with overdue time. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the procrastination.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of deducting mark on late works far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of deducting the student's mark prove the significance of the late work, but also pinpoint the role of educations implications
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll discuss that throughout this essay. From the social standpoint, students wor...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d working late apparently can be seen. Within the realm of science, the student...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nceived notion of the procrastination. To conclude, while there are several com...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, of course, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66926070039 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3033346582 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642023346304 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9381157845 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.416666667 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0964160015464 0.242375264174 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319254937547 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0247494691324 0.071462118173 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0564732858336 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281500098911 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.