Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree or experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books, agree or disagree?

Over the years experimental learning has gained more popularity and benefited learners across the globe in the field of management, engineering, and commerce. This essay will succinctly discuss the advantages of experimental learning in formal education and how it can efficiently produce desired results.
To begin with, when more practical exposure is included in the curriculum, the students get more opportunity to learn from real-world experiences. Practical knowledge is imperative to understand the fundamentals of any subject. In a recent case study, for instance, students who were taught with real-life examples produced better results in the examination. Thus, needless to say, all these associated merits of innovative learning have a positive and conspicuous impact on the education system.
Furthermore, experimental learning can also develop a student's interest in any field. When students are taught with real technologies, they develop skills and interest. For example, biology is a subject which is directly related to the human body and existence and should be taught with more practical exposure. Hence, it is apparent why there is an upsurge in experimental learning.
This essay explained the benefits of experimental learning on students in formal education. In my view of the arguments outlined and elucidated above, the merits of experimental learning are too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 9.3 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 433, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...ssociated merits of innovative learning have a positive and conspicuous impact on th...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, in my view, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 20.9802955665 33% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 211.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6682464455 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11787833194 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611374407583 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2033616598 50.4703680194 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5833333333 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153804920593 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605436602455 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516285039645 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10545109711 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411907019065 0.0609392437508 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.