Whether the experimental learning can work well in formal education agree or disagree.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of peoplebelieving that the traditional method of learning is more accessible as compared to the practical learning. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead a myriad of concern in one's life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant ones in the fact that experimental learning helps the students to get touch with the team unity,as an instance by doing projects, meanwhile,this also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offer, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being more effective, and they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their life, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say all these merits are stand only one in good stead as far as augmenting the chance of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
There are, however some pitfalls, that easily overwhelm the potential benefit of dealing with the most expertise part of the formal education. The primary ones stem from the fact that by observing the aforementioned trend that the people not only realized its gravity but also gauged the magnitude of its repercussions, when it comes to today ever changing lifestyle. Besides it impact on the future job prospective is far reaching indeed. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of this growing assertion.
In view of arguments outline above , one can conclusion that despite its some counterarguments, the benefit of practical learning are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s will only lead a myriad of concern in ones life. However, I do not entirely accept...
^^^^
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...tudents to get touch with the team unity,as an instance by doing projects, meanwhil...
^^^
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , this
...an instance by doing projects, meanwhile,this also lead to numerous other benefits i...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stance by doing projects, meanwhile,this also lead to numerous other benefits in ...
^^
Line 2, column 321, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'offers'?
Suggestion: offers
...anks to the wide range of advantages it offer, not only can one benefit more when it ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...comes to today ever changing lifestyle. Besides it impact on the future job prospective...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ion. In view of arguments outline above , one can conclusion that despite its som...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96478873239 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89915452381 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580985915493 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8650308118 50.4703680194 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.079165510501 0.242375264174 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0242905228022 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304730442781 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0501375714438 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274848169575 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.